COUNTER-NARRATIVES WITHIN POWER DISCOURSE IN ELECTORAL PRACTICE: A FOUCAULDIAN ANALYSIS OF THE 2024 BANTEN GUBERNATORIAL ELECTION

  • Alamsyah Alamsyah Department of Communications Sahid University, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Udi Rusadi Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Frengki Napitupulu Department of Communications Sahid University, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Marlinda Irwanti Institute of Communication and Business, LSPR

DOI

https://doi.org/10.53625/ijss.v5i6.12577

Keywords

Counter-Narrative, Power Discourse, Political Dynasty, Foucault, Banten Election 2024, Political Communication

Abstract

This study examines the role of counter-narratives in the discourse of power during the 2024 Banten gubernatorial election using a Foucauldian critical perspective. For nearly two decades, political power in Banten was dominated by a dynastic network associated with Ratu Atut Chosiyah. However, the 2024 election marked a significant shift as the dynastic candidate was defeated by the Andra Soni–Ahmad Dimyati Natakusumah pair. This research aims to analyze how power discourse was constructed, how epistemic shifts occurred among the electorate, and how regimes of truth were produced through political communication. Employing a qualitative constructivist-critical approach, the study utilizes discourse analysis of campaign narratives, media content, and socio-political contexts. The findings reveal that the anti-corruption counter-narrative functioned as a strategic discursive formation that reconfigured public knowledge and delegitimized the dominant dynastic narrative. Social media amplification and the absence of explicit anti-corruption positioning from the dynastic camp strengthened this transformation. In Foucauldian terms, power operated as a strategy embedded in knowledge production, enabling voters to exercise agency through new regimes of truth at the polling booth. This study contributes theoretically by demonstrating the effectiveness of counter-narrative communication in disrupting entrenched political dynasties within democratic contexts and offers a model of discursive political communication for electoral transformation.

References

[1] Bacchi, C. (2009): Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be?, Pearson, Frenchs Forest.

[2] Bennett, W. L., and Segerberg, A. (2013): The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

[3] Bourdieu, P. (1991): Language and symbolic power, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

[4] Castells, M. (2012): Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age, Polity Press, Cambridge.

[5] Fairclough, N. (1995): Media discourse, Edward Arnold, London.

[6] Fairclough, N. (2013): Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language, 2nd ed., Routledge, London.

[7] Foucault, M. (1972): The archaeology of knowledge, Pantheon Books, New York.

[8] Foucault, M. (1977): Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison, Pantheon Books, New York.

[9] Foucault, M. (1980): Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977, Pantheon Books, New York.

[10] Foucault, M. (1982): The subject and power, Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.

[11] Foucault, M. (2008): The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France 1978–1979, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.

[12] Gramsci, A. (1971): Selections from the prison notebooks, International Publishers, New York.

[13] Habermas, J. (1989): The structural transformation of the public sphere, MIT Press, Cambridge.

[14] Heryanto, A. (2015): Identity and pleasure: The politics of Indonesian screen culture, NUS Press, Singapore.

[15] Lim, M. (2013): Many clicks but little sticks: Social media activism in Indonesia, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 43(4), 636–657.

[16] McNair, B. (2018): An introduction to political communication, 6th ed., Routledge, London.

[17] Mietzner, M. (2014): Indonesia’s 2014 elections: How Jokowi won and democracy survived, Journal of Democracy, 25(4), 111–125.

[18] Mietzner, M. (2019): Money, power, and ideology: Political parties in post-authoritarian Indonesia, NUS Press, Singapore.

[19] Mudde, C., and Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017): Populism: A very short introduction, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

[20] Postill, J., and Saputro, D. D. (2017): Digital activism and cyberconflict in Indonesia, International Journal of Communication, 11, 420–439.

[21] Tapsell, R. (2017): Media power in Indonesia: Oligarchs, citizens and the digital revolution, Rowman & Littlefield, London.

[22] Van Dijk, T. A. (1998): Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach, Sage, London.

[23] Van Dijk, T. A. (2008): Discourse and power, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.

[24] KPU (2023): Peraturan Komisi Pemilihan Umum tentang Tahapan dan Jadwal Pilkada 2024, Komisi Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia, Jakarta.

[25] KPU Provinsi Banten (2024): Dokumen tahapan Pilkada Banten 2024, Komisi Pemilihan Umum Provinsi Banten, Serang.

[26] Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 10 Tahun 2016 tentang Pemilihan Gubernur, Bupati, dan Wali Kota.

2026-04-01