HATE SPEECH ON ROCKY GERUNG OFFICIAL YOUTUBE CHANNEL AGAINST PRESIDENT JOKO WIDODO: A PRAGMATIC STUDY

Wulandari S.

doi:10.53625/ijss.v2i2.3058

Authors

Wulandari S. Master's Program Indonesian Postgraduate Faculty of Humanities, Hasanuddin University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53625/ijss.v2i2.3058

Keywords:

hate speech speech act Rocky Gerung Official President Joko Widodo youtube

Abstract

This study aims to reveal two things, namely the forms of hate speech on the Rocky Gerung Official youtube channel against President Joko Widodo and the forms of illocutionary speech acts in hate speech on the Rocky Gerung Official youtube channel against President Joko Widodo. This type of research is qualitative research with a pragmatic approach. The method used in this study, namely the method of listening to the technique of documentation and note-taking techniques. The data sources for this research are videos on the Rocky Gerung Official youtube channel in 2021-2022. The population of this research is the entire speech containing hate speech on the Rocky Gerung youtube channel. Sampling was done purposively. The data analysis of this research was done descriptively. The results of this study indicate that on the Rocky Gerung Official youtube channel there are six forms of hate speech against President Joko Widodo, namely insults, defamation, unpleasant acts, provocation, incitement, and spreading of false news and there are four forms of illocutionary speech acts in hate speech. Towards President Joko Widodo in the form of assertive, expressive, commissive, and declarative with each function, namely, stating, informing, promising, angry, feeling funny, and giving names

References

Alwasilah, A. Chaedar. 1993. Pengantar Sosiolinguistik Bahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.

Amrullah, F., Yassi, A.H., Gusnawaty, G. (2020) Modalitas Dalam Teks Berita Hoaks: Kajian Linguistik Sistemik Fungsional. Jurnal Ilmu Budaya, 8 (1), 37-45

Daniels, Jessie. 2008. Race, Civil Rights, and Hate Speech in the Digital Era. Jurnal CUNY Academi Works. 1(4): 129-154.

Fasold, Ralph. 2006. An Introduction to Language and Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kridalaksana, Harimurti. 2001. Kamus Linguistik. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Kramadanu, W., Gusnawaty, Maknun, T., Hasyim, M. (2022). Transivitas dan Konteks Situasi dalam Teks Pidato Nadiem Makarim pada Hari Guru Sedunia 2021: Kajian Linguistik Sistemik Fungsional. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Sastra, 8, 1, 406-416

Leech, Geoffrey. 1993. Prinsip-Prinsip Pragmatik. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Nababan, P.J.W. 1987. Ilmu Pragmatik. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Polri. 2015. “Surat Edaran Kapolri tentang Penangangan Ujaran Kebencian.”

Rusminto, Nurlaksana Eko. 2009. Analisis Wacana Bahasa Indonesia (Buku Ajar). Bandar Lampung: Universitas Lampung.

R. Soesilo. 1995. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Serta Komentar-Komentarnya Lengkap Pasal Demi Pasal. Bogor: Politeia.

Sudaryanto. 1993. Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa dalam Lingual dalam Linguistik. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana Universitas Press.

Sugiono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: ALFABETA.

Suwito. 1983. Pengantar Awal Sosiolinguistik Teori dan Problem. Surakarta: UNS Press.

Tim Penyusun. 2016. Pedoman Kajian Linguistik Forensik: Forensics Linguistics Research Guidebook. Bandung. Disahkan oleh Kepala Pusat Pengembangan Strategi dan Diplomasi Kebahasaan. Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.

Tsesis, Alexander. 2009. Dignity and Speech: the Regulation of Hate Speech in a Democracy. Jurnal Loyola University Chicago. 14(1): 55-70.

Wijana, I Dewa Putu. 1996. Dasar-Dasar Pragmatik. Jakarta: Andi.

Yule, George. 2006. Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar (Terjemahan).