PRAGMATIC FAILURE TO PRAISE AND PRAISE RESPONSE TO ARABIC AND ENGLISH LEARNERS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53625/ijss.v2i2.3072Keywords:
Pragmatics Failure English Students Arabic StudentsAbstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the pragmatic failure in English and Arabic students at the UIN Alauddin Makassar's Faculty of Adab and Cultural Studies. The data for the study were gathered through observation, distribution of questionnaires in the form of a discourse completeness test (DCT), and interviews. Quantitative and qualitative research data were collected in this research. This study employed three statistical models or techniques: descriptive statistics, association rules (a priori algorithm), Chi Square, and qualitative analysis. The results shos that there are three kinds of pragmatic failure that produced by the English and Arabic students such as sociopragmatic, pragmalinguistic, and psychopragmatic aspects. In addition, The researcher suggests to the next researcher to study more deeply about the types of pragmatic failure in other fields.
References
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford university press.
Blum-Kulka, S. (1980). Learning to Say What You Mean in a Second Language; a Study of the Speech Act Performance of Learners of Hebrew as a Second Language.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied linguistics, 1(1), 1-47.
Cohen, A. D., & Olshtain, E. (1981). Developing A Measure of Sociocultural Competence: The Case of Apology 1. Language learning, 31(1), 113-134.
Darwis, M. & Kamsinah. (2019). The Contribution of Indonesian Language on Buginese Vocabulary Development: A Case Study of the Use of Buginese on Facebook social media. Sawerigading, 25(2), 107—118.
Eisenstein, M. & Bodman, J. W. (1986). „I very appreciate‟: Expressions of gratitude by native and non-native speakers of American English. Applied Linguistics, 7(2),167-185.
Fatimah, A., & Kamsinah. (2021). A Pragma-Stylistic Study of Illocutionary Act in Buginese Drama Texts. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Indonesian Linguistics Society (KIMLI 2021). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 62(2). 41-44.
Gumperz, J. J., & Tannen, D. (1979). Individual and social differences in language use. In Individual differences in language ability and language behavior (pp. 305-325). Academic Press.
He, Z., & Ran, Y. P. (1988). A survey of pragmatics. Changsha: Hunan Education Publishing House, 157-162.
Hymes, D.H. (1972) “On Communicative Competence” In: J.B. Pride and J. Holmes (eds)
Sociolinguistics. Selected Readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp. 269-293.
Idris, A. M. S., Adliah, A., & Alfina, S. (2020). Multilingual Interaction in Classroom Context. ETERNAL (English, Teaching, Learning, and Research Journal), 6(2), 381-393.
Kamsinah., Darwis, M., Fatimah, A., & Imran, M. A. (2021). Argument Structure in Indonesian Passive Voice: Universal Grammar Analyses. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Indonesian Linguistics Society (KIMLI 2021). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 62(2). 346-350.
Lado, R. 1957. Linguistics Across Culture. USA: Ann Arbor.
Olshtain, E. 1983. Sociocultural competence and language transfer: the case of apology. In Gass, S. and Selinker, L., editors, Language transfer in language learning, Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 232-49.
Thomas, J. A. (1981). Pragmatic Failure [Unpublished MA dissertation]. University of Lancaster.
Yulianti, S., Arafah, B., Rofikah, U., Idris, A. M. S., Samsur, N., & Arafah, A. N. B. (2022). Conversational Implicatures on Saturday Night Live Talk Show. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(1), 189-19
