TANGGUNG JAWAB KANTOR JASA PENILAI PUBLIK (KJPP) DALAM MELAKUKAN APPRAISAL (PENILAIAN) ATAS JAMINAN YANG DIGUGAT OLEH KREDITUR

Authors

  • Adhitya Anindito Program Pascasarjana Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Jayabaya Jakarta
  • Arief Wibisono Program Pascasarjana Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Jayabaya Jakarta
  • Putra Hutomo Program Pascasarjana Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Jayabaya Jakarta

Keywords:

Public Appraiser, Appraisal, Collateral, Creditor

Abstract

The role of Public Appraisal Firms (Kantor Jasa Penilai Publik/KJPP) in the financial sector, particularly in the valuation of collateral during the credit approval process, is crucial to ensure that the value of the collateralized asset aligns with financing requirements. Appraisals conducted by KJPP must be carried out professionally, objectively, and in accordance with the Indonesian Valuation Standards (Standar Penilaian Indonesia/SPI) and the Indonesian Code of Ethics for Appraisers (Kode Etik Penilai Indonesia/KEPI). However, in practice, legal disputes often arise when creditors feel aggrieved by the valuation results, even though KJPP is, from a legal standpoint, only responsible to the party that formally commissioned the appraisal. This research seeks to answer two main questions: How are the legal implications for creditors regarding the results of collateral appraisals conducted by Public Appraisal Firms (KJPP)? and How is the extent of legal responsibility borne by KJPP in the execution of collateral appraisals? The theoretical framework for this study is grounded in the theory of legal responsibility as articulated by Abdulkadir Muhammad and the theory of collateral law as developed by J. Satrio.

The methodology employed is normative juridical research based on legal literature or secondary data, including primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The research approach integrates statutory, conceptual, analytical, and case-based methods. Legal materials were collected by identifying and cataloguing positive legal norms, academic literature, journal articles, and other legal sources. The data were analyzed using systematic and grammatical interpretation, along with analogical legal construction.

The findings of this study indicate that KJPP bears legal responsibility solely to the party that lawfully commissions the appraisal and is explicitly designated as the report user in the engagement documentation. As such, creditors who are not directly involved in the appointment of the KJPP lack the legal standing to bring claims. The legal consequences for creditors stemming from appraisal results are limited, except in instances where a valid legal relationship exists and negligence on the part of KJPP can be demonstrably proven. Furthermore, the legal liability of KJPP is limited, proportional, and enforceable only by parties contractually bound to the appraisal engagement, provided that KJPP has performed its duties in accordance with SPI and KEPI. Therefore, in order to achieve legal certainty, all parties intending to rely on the appraisal report—especially creditors—must be formally included in the appraisal engagement and clearly identified as report users.

References

Abdulkadir Muhammad, Hukum Perusahaan Indonesia, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2010.

Amir Syarifuddin, Hukum Islam, Jakarta: Kencana, 2009.

Anastasia, Penilaian atas Agunan Kredit Berstatus Surat Hijau, Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan Vol. 8 No. 2, September 2006.

Herowati Poesoko, Parate Executie Obyek Hak Tanggungan (Inkonsistensi, Konflik Norma dan Kesatuan Inkonsistensi, Konflik Norma dan Kesatuan Penalaran dalam UUHT), Yogyakarta: Laksbang Pressindo, 2007.

Joni Emirzon, Aspek-Aspek Hukum Perusahaan Jasa Penilai, Jakarta: Gramedia, 2000.

M. Bahsan, Penilaian Jaminan Kredit Perbankan Indonesia, jakarta: Rejeki Agung, 2002.

M. Yahya Harahap, Hukum Perdata dalam Praktek, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2017.

Magister Ilmu Hukum, Buku Pedoman Penulisan Tesis, Program Pasca Sarjana, Universitas Jayabaya, Jakarta, 2020.

MAPPI, Kode Etik Penilai Indonesia dan Standar Penilaian Indonesia Edisi VII – 2018, Jakarta: KPSPI MAPPI, 2018.

Maria Farida Indrati, Ilmu Perundang-Undangan: Jenis, Fungsi, dan Materi Muatan, Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2007.

Maria Farida Indrati, Ilmu Perundang-Undangan: Proses dan Teknik Pembetukannya, Jakarta: Kanisius, 2013.

Mochtar Kusumaatmadja, Konsep-Konsep Hukum Dalam Pembangunan, Bandung: P.T. Alumni, 2006.

Moeljatno, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2008.

Muhammad Yusuf, Standar Profesi dan Tanggung Jawab Profesi Penilai, Depok: UI Press, 2015.

Mulyadi, Tuntutan Provisionil Dalah Hukum Acara Perdata, Jakarta: Djambatan, 1996.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana, 2019.

Philipus M. Hadjon, Hukum Administrasi dan Hak Asasi Manusia, Surabaya: Universitas Airlangga Press, 2006.

R. Abdoel Djamali, Pengantar Hukum Indonesia, Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada, 2007.

R. Soeroso, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010.

Retnowulan Sutantio, dkk, Penelitian tentang Perlindungan Hukum Eksekusi Jaminan Kredit, BPHN, 1997/1998.

Soedjono Dirdjosisworo, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2014.

Subekti, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata, Jakarta: Intermasa, 2001.

Sudibyanung, dkk., Buku Ajar Dasar-Dasar Penilaian Aset dan Properti, Konsepsi Nilai, Yogyakarta: STPN Press, 2020.

Sudikno Mertokusumo, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Jakarta: Liberty, 2010.

Sudikno Mertokusumo, Penemuan Hukum, Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2009.

Titik Triwulan dan Shinta, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pasien, Jakarta: Prestasi Pusataka, 2010.

Perundang-Undangan

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.

Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2023 tentang Pengembangan dan Penguatan Sektor Keuangan.

Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia.

Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 101/PMK.01/2014 Tahun 2014 tentang Penilai Publik jo Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 56/PMK.01/2017 Tahun 2017 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 101/PMK.01/2014 Tahun 2014 tentang Penilai Publik jo Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 228/PMK.01/2019 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 101/PMK.01/2014 Tahun 2014 tentang Penilai Publik.

Yurisprudensi

Putusan Nomor 504/Pdt.G/2020/PN Jkt.

Putusan Nomor 503/Pdt.G/2020/PN Jkt.

Putusan Nomor 920 K/Pdt/2024 PT JAKARTA

Downloads

Published

2025-08-01

How to Cite

Anindito, A., Arief Wibisono, & Putra Hutomo. (2025). TANGGUNG JAWAB KANTOR JASA PENILAI PUBLIK (KJPP) DALAM MELAKUKAN APPRAISAL (PENILAIAN) ATAS JAMINAN YANG DIGUGAT OLEH KREDITUR. Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge, 5(3), 3303–3316. Retrieved from https://bajangjournal.com/index.php/JIRK/article/view/10953

Issue

Section

Articles