AN ANALYSIS ON LEXICAL ASPECTS IN CARTOON DISCOURSES IN “DONALD DUCK” (A COMIC BOOK PUBLISHED BY M & C PT. GRAMEDIA MAGAZINE)
Keywords:
Cartoon, Dialogue Discourse, Lexical AspectsAbstract
This paper presents an analysis on lexical aspect in cartoon discourses in “donald duck” (a comic book published by m & c pt. gramedia megazine). Through this writing, the writer would like to conduct a research about what are lexical aspects in cartoon discourses in Donald Duck?. The aim of this study is to find out the lexical aspects in cartoon discourses in Donald Duck. The method in research is a descriptive qualitative method by doing a library research. The subject of this research was taken to be analyzed in this writing is the English –Indonesia languages cartoon discourses especially in Donald Duck Book in the written form. The writer analyzed lexical aspects in cartoon discourses mentioned by Vendler (1967:151) they are: (a) a state verb (e.g., love), (b) an activity verb (e.g., call), (c) an accomplishment verb (e.g., build a zoo), (d) an achievement verb (e.g., fall). Cartoonists should have their own lexical aspect. In order to differentiate from another kinds of discourses. In creating cartoon discourses, not all the lexical aspects used once in a cartoon but it depends on the story and needs in cartoon itself. The writer suggests to those whoever interest in the field of cartoon discourses should master the lexical aspects of cartoon discourses because lexical aspects is a basic in creating cartoon discourse, oral or written form
References
Apte, Mahadev, I. 1985. Humor and Laughter. Itacha Cornell University Press.
Binnick, R.I. (2003). Time and The Verb A Guide to Tense and Aspect. New York: Oxford University Press.
Binnick, R.I. (1991). Time and Verb: A Study of Tense and Aspect. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.
Comrie, Bernand. (1976). Aspect: An introduction to the Study of Verbal aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge University. Press.
Comrie Bernad. (1981) b. Aspect and Voice: Some Reflections on Perfect and Passive. In P. J. Tedeschi and A. Zaenem (eds).
Dahl. 1985. Tense and Aspect System. Oxford: Backwell.
Declerck, R. (1979). Aspect and the Bounded/Unbounded (Telic/Atelic) Distinction. Linguistics, 17,761, 794.
Dowty, D.R. (1979). Word Meaning and Montague Grammar Reid Dordrecht
Dowty, D.R .(1991). Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection. Language, 67,54-619.
Danandjaya, james. 1989. “Humor”. Ensl.
Filip, H. (1990). Thematic Roles and Aktionasart. In B. Birch, K. Hunt and V. Hunt (eds), Proceedings of the Twentieth Western Conference on Linguistics. Vol. 3 (pp. 88-99). Frenso.
Gay, L. R. (1992). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application. New York : Macmillian Publishing Company.
Hornby, A.S. (1974). Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary of Current English Revised and Updated. London : Oxford University. Press.
Johnson, M.R. (1997). The Syntax and Semantics of Kikuyu Tense and aspect. Ph.D Disertation, Ohio State University.
Jhonson, B. W & Fey, M. E. (2006). Interaction of Lexical and Grammatical Aspect in toddlen’s Language. Journal of Child Language, 33, 419-435.
Kortmann, B. (1991).” The triad Tense- Aspect- Aktionsart: Problems and Possible Solution in C. Vettens & Vandewegde (eds). Belgian Journal of Linguistics 6:9-30.
Li, P. (2000). The Acquisition of Lexical and Grammatical Aspecin in a self organizing feature-map model. University of Richmond. Richmond, VA 23173,USA.
Logman Group Limited. (1983). Logman Dictonary of Comtemporary English Britain: The Pitman Press Both.
Ngongo, M. (2013). An Introduction to Educational Research Method. Artha Wacana Christiani University.
Pavis, Patrice. (1998). Dictionary of the Theater: Terms Concepts, and Analysis. Troto and Buffalo: University of Toroto Press.
Philips & Hardy.(2002). Discourse Analysis: Investigating Process of Social Constructions.
Van Hout. (2003). Acquiring telicity Cross linguistically: On the Acquisition of Teliticity Entailment Associated with Transitivity in M. Bowerman and P. Brown (eds) Cross linguistics Perception on Argument Structure: Implication for Learn ability. Hills-dale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Vendler, Zeno. (1957). “Verbs and Times”. Philosophical Review 56: 143-160. Reproduced in
Vendler, Zeno. (1967). Linguistics and Philosophy. 97-121. Ithaca/New York, Cornwell University Press.
Verkuyl, H. J. (1972). On The Composition Nature of the Aspect. Dordrecht. Redial. Published Version of a 1971 Ph.D. Dissertation.
Wiersma, William. (2000). Research Methods in Education. University of Toledo.
Wijana, Putu I. (2003). Kartun. Ombsak Jakarta.
