PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI DEBITUR ATAS PELAKSANAAN LELANG EKSEKUSI HAK TANGGUNGAN TANPA MENGGUNAKAN HARGA LIMIT YANG DITETAPKAN SECARA WAJAR
Keywords:
Legal Protection, Mortgage Auction Execution, Reserve PriceAbstract
Article 55 paragraph (1) of PMK No. 122 of 2023 states that every Auction implementation is required to have a Limit Value. However, in practice, the implementation of mortgage execution auctions is often carried out without paying attention to the provisions regarding a reasonable limit price. The formulation of the problem in this study is what are the legal consequences of implementing mortgage execution auctions without using a reasonably determined limit price? And what is the legal protection for debtors for implementing mortgage execution auctions without using a reasonably determined limit price? The theories used in this study are the theory of legal consequences according to R. Soeroso and the theory of legal protection according to Satjipto Rahardjo.
The method used in this research is a normative juridical research type in the form of legal materials from libraries or secondary data with primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials sources. The research approach used is a statutory, conceptual, analytical and case approach. The legal material collection technique is carried out by identifying and inventorying positive legal regulations, and researching library materials relevant to the problem. The legal material analysis technique is carried out with systematic legal interpretation, grammatical and analogical construction.
The results of the study indicate that the legal consequences of implementing a mortgage auction without using a reasonably determined limit price are that the auction is invalid and has no binding legal force. The unfairness in determining the limit price that is not based on an objective and independent assessment has caused real losses for the debtor. Therefore, this action can be categorized as an unlawful act (onrechtmatige daad). The consequences of this violation not only cause the cancellation of the auction results, but also have an impact on the legal status of the collateral object, which must be returned to its original condition before the auction was conducted. Legal protection for debtors in implementing a mortgage auction without using a reasonably determined limit price is provided in the form of repressive legal protection. This protection allows the aggrieved debtor to file an objection or lawsuit through the courts. The legal basis refers to Article 1365 of the Civil Code concerning unlawful acts, which occur when the execution is carried out without paying attention to the principle of prudence, without involving an independent assessment, or in bad faith. In this context, the debtor can demand the cancellation of the auction results and the restoration of rights to the collateral object that has been auctioned illegally.
References
Burhan Sidabariba, Lelang Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan, Papas Sinar Sinanti, Depok, 2019
Gunawan Widjaja, Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan dan Permasalahannya, RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2003.
Jaya Subadi Eka, Restrukturisasi Kredit Macet, CV. Hikam Media Utama, Yogyakarta, 2019.
Jessica A Putri Hutapea, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Debitur Atas Lelang Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Yang Tidak Mencapai Nilai Maksimum, Jurnal Kertha Semaya, Volume 9, No. 3, 2021.
M. Bahsan, Hukum Jaminan dan Kredit Perbankan Indonesia, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2013
Munir Fuady, Hukum Perkreditan Kontemporer, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2006.
R. Soeroso, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2006.
R. Subekti, Hukum Perjanjian, Intermasa, Jakarta, 2005
Rachmadi Usman, Hukum Jaminan Keperdataan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2019
Rahman, H., Aspek–Aspek Hukum Pemberian Kredit Perbankan di Indonesia, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 1998.
Salim HS, Hukum Jaminan dan Jaminan Kebendaan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2016
Satijipto Raharjo, Ilmu Hukum, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2000.
Sudikno Mertokusumo, Penemuan Hukum, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2009.
Sumartik dan Misti Hariasih, Manajemen Perbankan, Umsida Press, Sidoarjo, 2018
Perundangan
Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia 1945 (UUD 1945) dan amandemen
Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata)
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria
Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 tentang Hak Tanggungan atas Tanah Beserta Benda-Benda yang Berkaitan dengan Tanah
Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 122 Tahun 2023 Tentang Petunjuk Pelaksanaan Lelang
Yurisprudensi
Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jember Nomor 128/Pdt.Bth/2023/PN Jmr
Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Parigi Nomor 29/Pdt.G/2021/PN Prg
Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Jawa Tengah Nomor 86/Pdt/2020/PT SMG
