PRAGMATICS STUDY ON POLITENESS DYNAMICS THROUGHOUT ORGANIZATIONAL HIERARCHIES
Keywords:
Pragmatics, Politeness, HierarchiesAbstract
This study is focused on the dynamics of language politeness used in local fast-food Industry particularly on handling complaint by hierarchical structure. Adopting pragmatic framework and Leech's Principle of Politeness, Brown & Levinson's face theory. The data were collected from various levels of the organization, from the top managerial level to operational staff. The result shows an inverse correlation between power and the burden of politeness principle in handling complaint . Informants at the CEO level tend to use the bald on record strategy and violate politeness maxims for the sake of policy efficiency. Conversely, informants at the middle level (Manager) use politeness as an instrument of diplomacy, while front line staff (Cashier and Crew) demonstrate compliance with the highest maxims through mitigation and humility strategies to reduce conflict. These results prove that politeness in a professional context is a functional instrument determined by organizational roles and managerial responsibilities, not just personal ethics.
References
Purnomo, B. (2025). Cultural pragmatics of politeness: The role of Javanese Krama Inggil in Indonesian academic communication. Journal of Linguistics, Culture and Communication, 3(2), 248-263.
Amin, F. H., Mohamad, A. R., Sudding, M. F. J., Susanto, A. K., & Hanafie, N. K. (2025). Exploring the Transactional Communication Model in Managing Work Responsibilities. Celebes Journal of Language Studies, 5(2), 323-336. https://doi.org/10.51629/cjls.v5i2.267
Suryani, I. (2025). Students Politeness in Academic Interactions at Higher Education Institutions. Continuous Education: Journal of Science and Research, 6(2), 120-127.
Leech, G. (1983) Principles of Pragmatics London: Longman
van Mulken, M., & Heslenfled, L. (2025). Improving Complaint Handling: The Rhetorical Turn in Defensive and Accommodative Strategies. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 23294906241308523.
Nadia, R., & Syam, A. M. (2025). THE ROLE OF NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION IN IMPROVING INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS IN THE WORKPLACE. International Journal of Cultural and Social Science, 6(1), 72-82.
Dewi, N. L. S., Adijaya, M. A., & Meirawati, D. K. (2025). POLITENESS STRATEGIES IN RECEPTIONISTS’VERBAL COMMUNICATION AT NEW SUNARI LOVINA BEACH RESORT. Lingua, 32(2), 35-48.
Rahardi R. Kuncana. 2003. Pragmatik: Kesantunan Imperatif Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Erlangga. Rusminto, Nurlaksana Eko. 2009. Analisis Wacana Bahasa Indonesia (Buku Ajar). Bandarlampung: Universitas Lampung.
Jawas, E. C., Yanti, D., & Hizbullah, N. (2025). A Pragmatic Analysis of Politeness Maxims in Indonesian Online Customer Service Interactions. JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 13(4), 2173-2183.
Kaur, K., Suppiah, P. C., Arumugam, N., & Idham, M. (2022). Politeness and Negotiation Strategies in Handling Customers: Conflict-Resolution. International Journal of Academic Research in
Business and Social Sciences, 12(8), 1002 – 1017
Pragmatic Analysis of Leech’s Politeness Principles in Encanto Movie. (2026). ENGLISH JOURNAL OF INDRAGIRI, 10(1), 388-406.
Ariani, P., & Anindita, W. K. (2024). Application and violation of politeness maxims used by President Biden’s speech: A pragmatics analysis. Jurnal CULTURE (Culture, Language, and Literature Review), 11(2), 83-96.
