EVALUASI KEBIJAKAN PENGELOLAAN SDM DALAM REFORMASI BIROKRASI DI BKPSDM KABUPATEN MAHAKAM ULU Oleh

  • Yulita Tipung Magister Ilmu Pemerintahan Universitas Mulawarman
  • Muhammad Noor Magister Ilmu Pemerintahan Universitas Mulawarman
  • Adam Idris Magister Ilmu Pemerintahan Universitas Mulawarman
  • M. Aviv Adhitya Putra Pratama4 Ilmu Pemerintahan Universitas Mulawarman

Abstract

Bureaucratic reform positions the management of civil servant human resources (ASN) as a strategic instrument in achieving a professional, effective, and performance-oriented bureaucracy. This study aims to evaluate policies on ASN human resource management in supporting bureaucratic reform at the Regional Personnel and Human Resources Development Agency (BKPSDM) of Mahakam Ulu Regency. The study employs a qualitative approach with a descriptive-evaluative design. Research subjects were selected purposively, including leaders and personnel involved in staffing management. Data were collected through in-depth interviews and document analysis, such as regulations, personnel documents, Employee Performance Targets (SKP), and bureaucratic reform reports. Data analysis used William N. Dunn’s policy evaluation framework, which includes effectiveness, efficiency, adequacy, equity, responsiveness, and appropriateness. The results indicate that policies have been implemented in accordance with regulations and have maintained administrative functions. However, they have not been fully effective in improving individual and organizational performance. Implementation remains procedurally oriented, while competency development has not been fully based on organizational needs. These findings highlight that policy success should be measured by its impact on performance and the achievement of bureaucratic reform goals.

References

[1] Dunn, W. N. (2015). Public policy analysis: An integrated approach. Routledge.

[2] Dwiyanto, A. (2021). Reformasi birokrasi publik di Indonesia. Ugm Press.

[3] Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis. sage.

[4] Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Revisi). Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 102–107.

[5] Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis-into the age of austerity. Oxford university press.

[6] Prasojo, E., & Kurniawan, T. (2019). Reformasi birokrasi dan tata kelola pemerintahan. In Rajawali Pers.

[7] Sugiyono, P. D. (2019). metode penelitian pendidikan (kuantitatif, kualitatif, kombinasi, R&D dan penelitian pendidikan). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan, 67(2019), 18.

[8] Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi. (2025). Grand Design Reformasi Birokrasi Nasional 2025–2045. Jakarta: KemenPANRB.

[9] Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2017 tentang Manajemen Pegawai Negeri Sipil sebagaimana telah diubah terakhir. Diambil 23 Januari 2026 Dari https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/69842/pp-no-11-tahun-2017

[10] Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 81 Tahun 2010 tentang Grand Design Reformasi Birokrasi 2010–2025. Diambil 23 Januari 2026 Dari https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/41159/perpres-no-81-tahun-2010

[11] Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2023 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara. Diambil 23 Januari 2026 Dari https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/259426/uu-no-20-tahun-2023

2026-04-05