ANALISIS PELAKSANAAN DIVERSI TERHADAP ANAK YANG BERKONFLIK DENGAN HUKUM (STUDI KANTOR KEPOLISIAN RESORT KOTA BAUBAU)
Keywords
Diversion, Children, Law, CrimeAbstract
Diversion is a process that allows for the transfer of juvenile cases from formal criminal justice channels to non-criminal justice channels. This approach aims to provide alternative solutions that better prioritize the best interests of children, without requiring them to enter the justice system, which tends to be more formal and harsh. Diversion allows for more humane and restorative solutions, focusing on children's rehabilitation and reintegration into society. This study aims to examine the Implementation of Diversion for Children in Conflict with the Law (Study at the Baubau City Police Station). This research is empirical juridical. The research problem approaches used in this study are: the Legal Approach, the Conceptual Approach, and the Case Approach. Descriptive analysis provides an explanation, depiction, and presentation of an event or legal condition as it is based on the research findings. The results of the study indicate that diversion for child abuse crimes can be concluded as the implementation of diversion for child abuse crimes is in accordance with Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. In this case, investigators must first consider the category of crime committed by the child when implementing diversion, as this category significantly influences the diversion process. This means that diversion can only be granted to children who commit minor crimes. However, diversion cannot be granted to children who commit serious crimes. Furthermore, investigators must also consider the child's age, as this provision is intended to determine the priority for granting diversion.
References
[1] Adami Chazawi. Pelajaran Hukum Pidana. (Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2002).
[2] Agung ayu ari gusti & nurlitasari dewi farida. Asupan Gizi, Pola Makan Dan Kesehatan Gigi Anak. Interdental J. Kedokt. Gigi 4, 86–103 (2017).
[3] Teti, P., Somawijaya, S. & Atmaja, B. A. Restorative Justice in Cases of Child Sexual Abuse by Children : Between Child Protection and the Enforcement of Justice. 12, 329–344 (2026).
[4] Nugraha, K. P. Perlindungan Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia Bagi Pekerja Anak Berdasarkan Konteks Undang-Undang. RIGHT J. Agama dan Hak Azazi Mns. 1, 7–13 (2023).
[5] Evan Tijang. Sistem Sanksi Pidana Dalam Hukum Pidana Anak di Indonesia. Lex Crim. 3, 63–72 (2014).
[6] Nur, H. & Makmun, S. Keadilan Restoratif dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak: Analisis Undang-Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak (UU No. 11 Tahun 2012) sebagai Paradigma Alternatif. J. Law, Ethics, Multidiscip. Res. 1, 1–6 (2025).
[7] Romli atmasasmita. Peradilan Anak Di Indonesia. (Mandar Maju, Bandung, 1997).
[8] Paulus Hadisuprapto. Delinkuensi Anak: Pemahaman Dan Penanggulangannya. (Bayumedia Publishing, Malang, 2018).
[9] Abdul Kadir Muhammad. Hukum Dan Penelitian Hukum. (Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2004).
[10] Irwansyah. Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode Dan Praktik Penulisan. Artikel. (Mitra Buana Media, Yogyakarta, 2020).
[11] Sugiyono. Statistika Untuk Penelitian. (Penerbit Alfabeta, Bandung, 2021).
[12] Wiyono, R. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Di Indonesia. (Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2015).
[13] Wahyudi, S. Implementasi Ide Diversi Dalam Pembaruan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Di Indonesia. (Genta Publishing., Yogyakarta, 2011).
[14] Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief. Teori-Teori Dan Kebijakan Hukum. Pidana. (Alumni, Bandung, 1992).
[15] Arif, B. N. Masalah Penegakan Hukum Dan Kebijakan Penanggulangan Kejahatan. (Bandung, 2011).
[16] Supeno, H. Kriminalisasi Anak. (PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta, 2010).
[17] Dewi, E. Sistem Pemidanaan Indonesia Yang Berkearifan Lokal. (Justice Publisher, Bandar Lampung, 2014).





