Realisasi Makna Eksperiensial dalam Teks The Sea Eagle: Analisis Sistem Transitivitas

  • Umar Yais Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang

Keywords

descriptive text, experiential meaning, systemic functional linguistics, transitivity system, English language teaching

Abstract

This study examines how experiential meaning is constructed in The Sea Eagle through the transitivity system of Systemic Functional Linguistics. It aims to identify the process types and interpret how their distribution contributes to its descriptive character. The study employed a descriptive qualitative design and treated the text as a single documentary source. Clause segmentation and functional classification followed Halliday and Matthiessen’s transitivity framework and Eggins’s clause-based analytical procedure. The calculation comprised finite clauses that could be classified. One ambiguous construction was excluded because its clause boundary could not be established without reconstruction, while two nonfinite material extensions were discussed but omitted from the percentage calculation. Thirteen finite clauses were retained. Relational processes occurred eight times (61.5%), material processes four times (30.8%), and verbal processes once (7.7%). No mental, behavioral, or existential processes were identified. The relational clauses were evenly divided between possessive attributive and intensive attributive patterns, enabling the text to represent the eagle through its physical attributes, possessions, and functional characteristics. Material processes added habitual actions, particularly hunting and walking, whereas the single verbal process introduced an explanatory relation through means. These choices support the text’s descriptive purpose and also suggest a limited affinity with descriptive reports because several statements refer to eagles generically. Since the analysis concerns one text containing grammatical irregularities, the findings describe this specific textual configuration and should not be generalized to descriptive texts or learner writing more broadly.

References

Accurso, K., & Gebhard, M. (2021). SFL praxis in U.S. teacher education: A critical literature review. Language and Education, 35(5), 402–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2020.1781880

Alyousef, H. S., & Alyahya, A. M. (2018). The conceptualization of genre in systemic functional linguistics. RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 4(2), 91–99.

Anggun, S. K. (2016). An analysis of descriptive text in English textbook using transitivity system (A case study of reading passages). Journal of English and Education, 4(1), 147–158. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/L-E/article/view/4625

Apendi, T. L., & Mulyani, E. R. (2020). The analysis of transitivity process of students’ descriptive texts. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 3(3), 359–366. https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v3i3.p359-366

Correa, D., & Echeverri, S. (2017). Using a systemic functional genre-based approach to promote a situated view of academic writing among EFL pre-service teachers. HOW, 24(1), 44–62. https://doi.org/10.19183/how.24.1.303

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.

de Oliveira, L. C., & Smith, S. L. (2019). Systemic functional linguistics in teacher education. In Oxford research encyclopedia of education. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.494

Derewianka, B., & Jones, P. (2016). Teaching language in context (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Dewi, A., Samsi, Y., Miftkah, F., & Dewi, I. (2023). Analyzing The Transitivity Process of Descriptive Texts in Sixth Grade Elementary’s LKS. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 9(20), 28-35.

Durán-Bautista, D. C. (2021). Fostering written production of review texts among EFL university students through a genre-based approach. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 26(1), 117–138.

Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd ed.). Continuum.

Fiscarina, C. V., & Fauziati, E. (2024). Exploring EFL student’s descriptive text based on systemic functional linguistics: A case study at SMAN 1 Kartasura. Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 7(2), 4674–4683.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203431269

Khalil, K. A. F., Yusra, K., Udin, & Soepriyanti, H. (2022). Transitivity in English textbook: A case study of Bahasa Inggris textbook for tenth-grade students. JIIP-Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(11), 4662–4665. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v5i11.1135

Khorina, M. (2020). Process types in mechanical engineering texts: Transitivity analysis. Linguistics and ELT Journal, 8(2), 15–22.

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781

Martin, J. R. (2016). Meaning matters: A short history of systemic functional linguistics. WORD, 62(1), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2016.1141939

Martin, J. R., Quiroz, B., & Wang, P. (2023). Systemic functional grammar: A text-based description of English, Spanish and Chinese. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009284950

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Nagao, A. (2018). A genre-based approach to writing instruction in EFL classroom contexts. English Language Teaching, 11(5), 130–147. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n5p130

Nagao, A. (2022). A genre-based approach to teaching descriptive report writing to Japanese EFL university students. TESL-EJ, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.26103a13

Noprianto, E. (2017). Student’s descriptive text writing in SFL perspectives. IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics), 2(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v2i1.53

Nurwanti. (2022). A transitivity analysis on the third semester English Education Department students’ descriptive writing. SIBATIK Journal, 1(2), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.54443/sibatik.v1i2.11

Rahayu, N., & Musyarofah, S. U. (2022). ‘Functional writing’ as a social act: SFL informed genre-based approach in teaching EFL writing to pre-service teachers. English Journal, 16(2), 99–114.

Rohmat, N., Nurhaeni, & Anggraeni, A. (2018). Transitivity analysis of tenth grade students’ descriptive text. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 1(3), 295–302. https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v1i3.p295-302

Santi, A. R. K., & Mukminatun, S. (2023). A transitivity analysis of reading passages in the textbook Bahasa Inggris for grade XI. Lingua Pedagogia, 5(1), 30–42.

Shi, L., Baker, A., & Chen, H. (2019). Chinese EFL teachers’ cognition about the effectiveness of genre pedagogy: A case study. RELC Journal, 50(2), 314–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217716506

Siregar, S. R. (2021). Students’ descriptive text writing in experiential function realization. English Education: English Journal for Teaching and Learning, 9(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.24952/ee.v9i01.4103

Tight, M. (2019). Documentary research in the social sciences. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529716559

Tracy, S. J. (2020). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

Wibowo, E. P., Lestari, A., & Adrian, M. (2024). A comparative analysis of transitivity system in model and student descriptive texts. Jurnal Al-Azhar Indonesia Seri Humaniora, 9(2), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.36722/sh.v9i2.2831

Xuan, W. W. (2018). Understanding experiential meaning-making in Chinese adolescent L2 writing: A systemic functional perspective. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 3, Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-018-0046-2

Yasuda, S. (2017). Toward a framework for linking linguistic knowledge and writing expertise: Interplay between SFL-based genre pedagogy and task-based language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 51(3), 576–606. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.383

Yuniar, Sinar, T. S., & Gurning, B. (2017). Process as a transitivity element in classroom discourse. Linguistik Terapan, 14(2), 194–203. https://doi.org/10.24114/lt.v14i2.8374

Yusuf, F. N., & Rofiawati, O. (2024). Does systemic functional linguistics genre pedagogy facilitate Islamic school students’ writing? Indonesian EFL Journal, 10(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v10i1.9304

2026-08-05