PEMBUKTIAN SEDERHANA DALAM PERMOHONAN PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG KAJIAN PUTUSAN NOMOR 252/PDT.SUS-PKPU/2021/PN.NIAGA.JKT.PST

Authors

  • Hendri Siahaan Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Jayabaya
  • Achmad Fitrian Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Jayabaya
  • Nur Hakim Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Jayabaya

Keywords:

Simple Proof, Petition, Suspension of Payment

Abstract

In Commercial Court practice, it is included in Decision Number 252/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2021/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst with one of the Legal Considerations that of Article 8 paragraph (4) of Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations regarding the existence of debt which are overdue and can be collected and the existence of two or more creditors mutatis mutandis also applies to requests for postponement of debt payment obligations. This is contrary to one of the conditions for submitting a request for a postponement of debt payment obligations by creditors based on Article 222 paragraph (1) of Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations and the provisions regarding the Court must grant the submitted request for a temporary postponement of debt payment obligations. by debtors or creditors based on Article 225 paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations. This research uses normative juridical research methods and descriptive analysis based on books, scientific works, journals, articles, decisions and statutory regulations. This research was conducted to analyze simple verification procedures in Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations and simple evidence in requests for postponement of debt payment obligations in the review of Decision Number 252/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2021/PN.Niaga.Jkt .Pst.

References

Efa Laela Fakhriah, Bukti Elektronik Dalam Sistem Pembuktian Perdata, PT Refika Aditama, Bandung, 2017.

Henry Campbell, Black’s Law Dictionary, Tenth Edition, Minnesota, West Publishing.co., 2010.

Jimmy Simanjuntak, “Penggunaan Informasi Debitor Dari Sistem Layanan Informasi Keuangan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (SLIK OJK) Sebagai Alat Bukti Permohonan PKPU”, Jurnal Hukum to-ra, Volume 9 Nomor 1 April 2023.

Juanda, H.E. “Kekuatan Alat Bukti Dalam Perkara Perdata Menurut Hukum Positif Indonesia”. Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi, 2016.

Krista Yitawati, Pujiyono, Adi Sulistyono, Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU), Deepublish, Yogyakarta, 2022.

Nelson Kapoyos, “Konsep Pembuktian Sederhana Dalam Perkara Kepailitan Kajian Putusan Nomor 125 Pk/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2015”, Lembaga Studi Hukum Indonesia, Jurnal Yudisial, Volume 10 Nomor 3 Desember 2017.

Putusan Nomor 252/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2021/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst.

Rudy A. Lontoh, Penyelesaian Utang Piutang Melalui Pailit atau Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, Alumni, Bandung, 2001.

Setiawan, Aneka Masalah Hukum dan Hukum Acara Perdata, Alumni, Bandung, 1992.

Siti Anisah, “Alternatif Penyelesaian Utang Piutang dalam Rangka Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, Jurnal Magister Hukum,” Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Volume 1 Nomor 1, 1999.

Susanti Adi Nugroho, Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia Dalam Teori dan Praktik serta Penerapan Hukumnya, Prenadamedia Group, Jakarta, 2018.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.

https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/arti-mutatis-mutandis-dan-contohnya-lt4bdfcd4e7c122, diakses 15 Desember 2023.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-26

Issue

Section

Articles