DISPARITAS PUTUSAN HAKIM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA DI WILAYAH HUKUM PENGADILAN NEGERI RANTAUPRAPAT

Authors

  • Haerul Mustofa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bina Bangsa
  • Henky Chandra Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bina Bangsa

Keywords:

Disparity, Decisions, Narcotics, Rantauprapat Court

Abstract

Different decisions result in arguments about the same customer against two different defendants with different charges. This study is basically descriptive normative law. The research results show that: Both assessments cited as case studies are based on inequality theory. The actual decision is heard in court and handled in a certain way By law. However, these results are not in accordance with the sense of justice that emerged in 2000. general; It would be better for the judge who hears this case to look at the actual legal facts in more depth to find the real truth of a problem. I have tried. The factors causing disparities in judges' decisions regarding drug offense cases covered in this research are: a) There are legal reasons for several interpretations of Articles 112 and 127 of the Narcotics Law. b) law enforcement factors; The judge has the discretion to exercise the power of discovery. Truth is not actually used by the judge in making decisions. c) legal and cultural factors; There is a culture of bribery and conciliation, processing requests and decisions of light punishment. Stakeholders must work together to decriminalize diversion by drug users regarding administrative procedures and medical services

References

Ashworth, Andrew., 2005, Sentencing and Criminal Justice: 5th Edition, New York: CambridgeUniversity Press.

Bungin, Burhan., 2009, Penelitian Kualitatif: Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Kebijakan Publik, dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya, Jakarta: Kencana.

Fajar, Mukti., dan Achmad, Yulianto., 2015, Dualisme Penelitian Hukum-Normatif dan Empiris, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Hiariej, Eddy OS., 2009, Asas Legalitas dan Penemuan Hukum Dalam Hukum Pidana, Jakarta:Erlangga.

Harkrisnowo, Harkristuti., 2003, “Rekonstruksi Konsep Pemidanaan: Suatu Gugatan Terhadap Proses Legislasi dan Pemidanaan di Indonesia”, Pidato, pada Upacara Pengukuhan Guru Besar Tetap dalam Ilmu Hukum Pidana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta.

Indah, Maya., 2011, Refleksi Pemikiran O.Notohamidjojo Untuk Mewujudkan Cara Berhukum Humanis, Salatiga: Balaiurang Utama UKSW.

International Drug Policy Consortium (IDPC), 2021, Panduan Kebijakan Narkotika, Psikotropika dan Zat Adiktif Lainnya (Napza), Edisi 2, Maret.

Krisnajadi, 1989, Bab-bab Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Bagian I, Bandung: Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Bandung.

Loqman, Loebby., 2002, Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana, Jakarta: Datacom. Marzuki, Peter Mahmud., 2007, Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.

Muladi dan Arief, Barda Nawawi., 2005, Teori-teori dan Kebijakan Pidana, Bandung: Alumni.

Notohamidjojo, 1970, Makna Negara Hukum, Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia.

Schaffmeister, D., dkk., diedit oleh Sahetapy, JE., 2004, Hukum Pidana 3, Yogyakarta: Konsorsium Ilmu Hukum Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI bekerjasama dengan Liberty.

Soekanto, Soerjono., 2001, Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sudarto, 1981, Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Bandung: Alumni. Journal articles:

Handy, Sobandi., 2011, “Pembaharuan Hukum Benda Nasional Sesuai Berdasarkan Cita Hukum Pancasila”, Disertasi, Universitas Parahyangan, Bandung.

Hasil Survei Nasional Prevalensi Penayalahgunaan Narkoba Tahun Anggaran 2014, hlm.42. KBBI Online, “Disparitas”, https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/disparitas, diakses Sabtu, 06 Maret 2021.

----------------, “Memiliki”, https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/memiliki, diakses Jumat, 18 Juni 2021.

----------------, “Menguasai”, https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/menguasai, diakses Jumat, 18 Juni 2021.

----------------, “Menyediakan”, https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/menyediakan, diakses Jumat, 18 Juni 2021.

----------------, “Menyimpan”, https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/menyimpan, diakses Jumat, 18 Juni 2021.

rumahcemara.or.id., “Lahan Basah Suap dan Pemerasan Dalam Pidana Narkoba”, https://rumahcemara.or.id/lahan-basah-pemidanaan-narkoba/, diakses Jumat, 18 Juni 2021.

Website Resmi BNN RI, “Press Release Akhir Tahun 2020: Sikap BNN Tegas, Wujudkan Indonesia Bebas dari Narkoba”, https://bnn.go.id/press-release-akhir-tahun-2020/, diakses Kamis, 17 Juni 2021.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-26

How to Cite

Haerul Mustofa, & Henky Chandra. (2024). DISPARITAS PUTUSAN HAKIM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA DI WILAYAH HUKUM PENGADILAN NEGERI RANTAUPRAPAT. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Sosial Humaniora, 3(3), 213–220. Retrieved from https://bajangjournal.com/index.php/JPDSH/article/view/7333

Issue

Section

Articles