BLENDED LEARNING MEDIATED INSTRUCTION IN ENGLISH CLASS: STUDENT ENGAGEMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53625/jcijurnalcakrawalailmiah.v1i8.2020Keywords:
blended learning mediated instruction, case study, & student engagement..Abstract
There have been many discussions on the concepts of student engagement in learning during Blended learning mediated instruction. Student engagement tended to be discussed in academic activities during Pandemic learning. This study explored the students’ engagement in a project-based blended learning classroom. It investigated how the project-based blended learning model motivates student engagement. A case study approach was adopted that involved ten English department students. Questionnaires and interviews were used to collect the data. Deci and Ryan’s theory (1985) opted to analyze the data. The results contribute to higher education pedagogy by providing insights into the use of project-based blended learning models in engaging students.
References
Adi Badiozaman, I. F. B., Leong, H., & Jikus, O. (2020). Investigating student engagement in
Malaysian higher education: A self-determination theory approach. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(10), 1364-1378.
Agarwal, S., & Kaushik, J. S. (2020). Student’s perception of online learning during COVID
pandemic. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 87(7), 554-554.
Austin, G. A. (2010). Administrative challenges and rewards of online learning in a rural
community college: Reflections of a distance learning administrator. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2010(150), 27-36.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis.
Chiu, T. K. (2021). Applying the self-determination theory (SDT) to explain student
engagement in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1-17.
Fredricks, J. A. (2011). Engagement in school and out-of-school contexts: A
multidimensional view of engagement. Theory into Practice, 50(4), 327-335.
Green, A. 2018. “The Influence of Involvement in a Widening Participation Outreach
Program on Student Ambassadors’ Retention and Success.” Student Success 9 (3):
25–37. doi:10.5204/ssj.v9i3
Hornstra, L., K. Stroet, E. van Eijden, J. Goudsblom, and C. Roskamp. 2018. “Teacher
Expectation Effects on Need-supportive Teaching, Student Motivation, and Engagement: A Self-determination Perspective.” Educational Research and Evaluation 24 (3–5): 324–345. doi:10.1080/13803611.2018.1550841.
Kahu, E., and K. Nelson. 2018. “Student Engagement in the Educational Interface:
Understanding the Mechanisms of Student Success.” Higher Education Research & Development 37 (1): 58–71. doi:10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197.
Keputusan Menteri Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 754/P/2020
Tentang Indikator Kinerja Utama.
Krause, K. L., & Armitage, L. (2014). Australian student engagement, belonging, retention
and success: A synthesis of the literature. The Higher Education Academy, 1-45.
Morgan, H. (2020). Best practices for implementing remote learning during a pandemic. The
Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 93(3), 135-141.
Riley, G. (2018). Unschooling: A direct educational application of Deci and Ryan’s (1985)
self determination theory and cognitive evaluation theory. European Journal of Alternative Education Studies.
