EPIDEMIOLOGI DIGITAL DAN DETERMINAN SOSIAL PADA LAYANAN PRIMER: TINJAUAN LITERATUR DAMPAK KOMPETENSI NAKES DAN SISTEM INFORMASI TERHADAP KETERLIBATAN PASIEN MELALUI MEDIASI PENGALAMAN PASIEN DI PUSKESMAS KABUPATEN LOMBOK TENGAH NTB
Keywords
Digital Epidemiology, Health Worker Competence, Information Systems, Patient Experience, Patient Engagement, PuskesmasAbstract
Background: Digital health transformation in primary care requires the integration of technology and human resource competence. In Central Lombok Regency, the effectiveness of digital epidemiology is heavily influenced by social determinants and the capacity of health workers to manage information systems.
Objective: This study aims to analyze the impact of health worker competence and information system quality on patient engagement, positioning patient experience as a mediating variable through a systematic literature review.
Methods: This research employs the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method. Literature searches were conducted on Scopus and Google Scholar databases within the 2014-2024 timeframe. Inclusion criteria focused on studies discussing primary health information systems, health workers' digital competence, and patient behavior.
Results: Synthesis of selected literature indicates that health workers' digital competence and information system quality significantly enhance the quality of interaction in community health centers (Puskesmas). Patient experience is proven to be a crucial mediating variable; efficient digital services create positive perceptions that encourage patients to become more actively involved in their health management. However, social determinants such as community digital literacy remain a challenge in optimizing patient engagement.
Conclusion: Strengthening health worker competence and information system reliability are key prerequisites for creating a superior patient experience, which ultimately increases active community participation in the digital epidemiology ecosystem at primary care levels.
References
[1] Buntoro, G. A., Santoso, S., & Wahyuni, A. S. (2023). Evaluasi kesuksesan implementasi sistem informasi manajemen puskesmas (SIMPUS). Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer, 10(2), 345-352.
[2] Carman, K. L., Dardess, P., Maurer, M., Sofaer, S., Adams, K., Bechtel, C., & Sweeney, J. (2013). Patient engagement: A framework: A multidimensional framework for patient engagement in health and health care. Health Affairs, 32(2), 223-231. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1067
[3] DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
[4] Haviluddin, H., Budiman, A., & Pakpahan, H. S. (2021). Analisis implementasi sistem informasi kesehatan pada pusat kesehatan masyarakat. Informatika Mulawarman: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komputer, 16(1), 45-51.
[5] Higgins, T., Larson, E., & Schnall, R. (2017). Unraveling the concepts of patient engagement and patient empowerment. American Journal of Health Promotion, 31(1), 30-36. https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.141020-LIT-536
[6] Kuek, A., & Hakkennes, S. (2020). Healthcare staff digital literacy levels and their attitudes towards information systems. Health Informatics Journal, 26(1), 592-612. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458219839613
[7] Larson, E., Sharma, J., Bohren, M. A., & Tunçalp, Ö. (2019). Monitoring the quality of care: Data sources, modern approaches, and global-level reporting. Global Health: Science and Practice, 7(Supplement 1), S158-S169. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00322
[8] Marmot, M. (2020). Health equity in England: The Marmot Review 10 years on. BMJ, 368, m693. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m693
[9] Moola, S., Munn, Z., Tufanaru, C., Aromataris, E., Sears, K., Scheckel, R., ... & Mu, P. (2020). Systematic reviews of etiology and risk. Dalam E. Aromataris & Z. Munn (Eds.), JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-01
[10] Nuryati, T., & Budiono, I. (2020). Faktor yang berhubungan dengan pemanfaatan sistem informasi kesehatan. Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat, 15(2), 210-218.
[11] O’Connor, S., Hanlon, P., O’Donnell, C. A., Garcia, S., Glanville, J., & Mair, F. S. (2016). Understanding factors affecting patient and public engagement and recruitment to digital health interventions: A systematic review of reviews. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 16(1), 120. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-016-0359-3
[12] Salathé, M. (2018). Digital epidemiology: What is it, and where is it going?. Life Sciences, Society and Policy, 14(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-017-0065-7
[13] Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
[14] Wolf, J. A., Niederhauser, V., Marshburn, D., & LaVela, S. L. (2014). Defining patient experience. Patient Experience Journal, 1(1), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.35680/2372-0247.1002
[15] Wong, G., Greenhalgh, T., Westhorp, G., Buckingham, J., & Pawson, R. (2013). RAMESES publication standards: Meta-narrative reviews. BMC Medicine, 11(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-20
[16] World Health Organization. (2020). Global strategy on digital health 2020-2025. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/documents/gs4dhdaa2a970632b412087a692751d921247.pdf
