MODEL EFEKTIVITAS IMPLEMENTASI K3 DI FASILITAS NUKLIR: INTEGRASI STANDAR BAPETEN DAN BUDAYA KESELAMATAN KERJA

  • Ridwan Taufik Hidayat Universitas Pamulang, Tangerang Selatan
  • Umi Rusilowati Universitas Pamulang, Tangerang Selatan
  • Hamsinah B Universitas Pamulang, Tangerang Selatan
  • Fitri Marsela Universitas Pamulang, Tangerang Selatan
  • Taswanda Taryo Universitas Pamulang, Tangerang Selatan

Keywords

OSH Effectiveness Model, BAPETEN, Safety Culture, RSG-GAS, Nuclear Facility

Abstract

Abstract: This study aims to formulate an effectiveness model for Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) implementation at the G.A. Siwabessy Multipurpose Reactor (RSG-GAS) Facility by integrating the regulatory standards of the Nuclear Energy Regulatory Agency (BAPETEN) with the reinforcement of safety culture. Using a qualitative approach with a case study design, data were collected through technical document reviews, field observations, and in-depth interviews with key personnel. The results indicate that the effectiveness of the OSH system cannot be achieved solely through administrative regulatory compliance. Instead, it requires an integrated model where BAPETEN standards serve as the structural framework, while safety culture acts as the operational driver. The critical determinants of this model's effectiveness include high-level management commitment, worker situational awareness, two-way safety communication, and the consistent application of field procedures. The study concludes that the ideal effectiveness model in a nuclear facility is a synergy between compliance-based safety and behavior-based safety. These findings are expected to serve as a strategic reference and an evaluation model for nuclear facility managers to enhance worker protection standards and facility security sustainably.

References

[1] American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). Washington, DC: APA Publishing.

[2] Canet, L., Takada, M., & Yasutaka, T. (2024). Comparative qualitative and quantitative analysis of guidelines for nuclear accident recovery. Radioprotection, 59(2), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2023043

[3] Flippo, E. B. (2021). Human resource management definition by different authors. Retrieved from https://expertpreviews.com/2021/10/06/human-resource- management-definition-by-different-authors

[4] George, R. T. (2021). Definition of management and leadership in organizations.

[5] Tatoli Journal of Organizational Studies, 5(2), 45–58.

[6] Goetsch, D. L. (2023). Occupational safety and health for technologists, engineers, and managers (10th ed.). Pearson Education.

[7] Griffin, R. W. (2021). Definition of human resource management. HRM Practice. Retrieved from https://hrmpractice.com/definition-of-human-resource- management

[8] Guan, J., & Henan, P. (2023). Adaptive management and complexity: Responding to organizational change. Journal of Management and Emerging Research, 12(3), 88–101.

[9] International Labour Organization. (2022). ILO World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2022. Geneva: ILO Publications.

[10] Kumar, R., Lim, S., & Sureka, S. (2024). Balanced scorecard as a performance management framework in modern organizations. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 25(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00700-6

[11] Koontz, H., & O’Donnell, C. (2021). Principles of management: The art of getting things done through and with people. McGraw-Hill.

[12] Lussier, R. N. (2021). Introduction to management. Fort Hays State University Press. https://fhsu.pressbooks.pub/management

[13] Manurung, R., & Hendayana, H. (2025). The future of management theory: Innovation, sustainability and transformative leadership. International Journal of Contemporary

[14] Management Studies, 17(1), 21–35. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392207375

2026-06-07