TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION: AN ALTERNATIVE NON-JUDICIAL SETTLEMENT OF ALLEGATIONS OF GROSS HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS
Keywords:
Human Rights, Non-Judicial, Reconciliation, TRCAbstract
Difficulties and concerns over the inability of the formal legal process to deal with past humanitarian crimes, plus the concern that this road could lead the nation back to an authoritarian regime, is a strong impetus for the need for other mechanisms, or alternative solutions, which are then generally known as "truth commissions and reconciliation”. Resolving allegations of gross human rights violations through non-judicial / non-judicial channels with the TRC mechanism can be an alternative for a country in its efforts to resolve various cases of gross human rights violations. Being able to reveal the facts or the truth and court proceedings on incidents of gross human rights violations committed by the old government regime. So that it can break the politics of impunity and usher in a new regime towards a democratic system and a rule of law as a large system for upholding human rights
References
Hayner, P. B. (1994). Fifteen truth commissions-1974 to 1994: A comparative study. Hum. Rts. Q., 16, 597.
Hayner, P. B., Riyadi, E., & Terre, E. C. (2005). Kebenaran tak terbahasakan: refleksi pengalaman komisi-komisi kebenaran, kenyataan dan harapan. ELSAM.
Huntington, S. P. (1993). The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century (Vol. 4). University of Oklahoma press.
Nasution, A. R. (2018). Penyelesaian Kasus Pelanggaran HAM Berat melalui Pengadilan Nasional dan Internasional serta Komisi Kebenaran dan Rekonsiliasi. Jurnal Mercatoria, 11(1), 90-126.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 JURNAL PENGABDIAN MANDIRI

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.