KEPEMIMPINAN, TUNJANGAN TAMBAHAN PENGHASILAN, DAN KINERJA PEGAWAI SEKTOR PUBLIK

  • Waode Muliati Magister Manajemen, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Enam Enam Kendari
  • Abdul Azis Muthalib Magister Manajemen, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Enam Enam Kendari
  • Nofal Supriaddin Magister Manajemen, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Enam Enam Kendari

Keywords

Kepemimpinan, Tunjangan Tambahan Penghasilan, Kinerja Pegawai, Sektor Publik, PLS-SEM

Abstract

Kinerja pegawai sektor publik dipengaruhi tidak hanya oleh arahan pimpinan, tetapi juga oleh bagaimana organisasi menerapkan penghargaan yang dipersepsikan relevan dengan tuntutan kerja. Penelitian ini menganalisis pengaruh kepemimpinan terhadap kinerja pegawai dengan tunjangan tambahan penghasilan (TPP) sebagai mediator pada Biro Perekonomian Sekretariat Daerah Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif melalui survei terhadap 57 pegawai. Data dikumpulkan dengan kuesioner skala Likert dan dianalisis menggunakan PLS-SEM dengan SmartPLS 4. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa kepemimpinan berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap TPP dan kinerja pegawai, sedangkan TPP berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap kinerja. TPP juga memediasi secara penuh hubungan kepemimpinan dan kinerja pegawai. Temuan memperluas literatur kepemimpinan sektor publik dengan menempatkan TPP sebagai mekanisme pertukaran organisasional yang menghubungkan perilaku kepemimpinan dengan kinerja. Implikasi praktis menekankan perlunya kepemimpinan yang jelas, suportif, partisipatif, dan berorientasi prestasi serta implementasi TPP yang adil, transparan, dan sesuai karakteristik pekerjaan.

References

[1] Schwarz, G., Eva, N., & Newman, A., 2020, Can public leadership increase public service motivation and job performance?, Public Administration Review, 80(4), 543-554, https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13182.

[2] Tran, Y.T., & Hoang, T.C., 2024, Transformational leadership and public employee performance: The mediating roles of employee participation and public service motivation, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 90(4), 793-809, https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523241230439.

[3] Fan, Y., Blalock, E.C., & Lyu, X., 2022, A meta-analysis of the relationship between public service motivation and individual job performance: Cross-validating the effect of culture, International Public Management Journal, 25(7), 1115-1130, https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2022.2072425.

[4] Giauque, D., Renard, K., Cornu, F., & Emery, Y., 2022, Engagement, exhaustion, and perceived performance of public employees before and during the COVID-19 crisis, Public Personnel Management, 51(3), 263-290, https://doi.org/10.1177/00910260211073154.

[5] Krijgsheld, M., Tummers, L.G., & Scheepers, F.E., 2022, Job performance in healthcare: A systematic review, BMC Health Services Research, 22, 149, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07357-5.

[6] van der Vaart, L., 2021, The performance measurement conundrum: Construct validity of the Individual Work Performance Questionnaire in South Africa, South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 24(1), a3581, https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v24i1.3581.

[7] Platania, S., Morando, M., Gruttadauria, S.V., & Koopmans, L., 2024, The Individual Work Performance Questionnaire: Psychometric properties of the Italian version, European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 14(1), 49-63, https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14010004.

[8] Vuong, B.N., 2023, The influence of servant leadership on job performance through innovative work behavior: Does public service motivation matter?, Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 45(3), 295-315, https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2022.2070517.

[9] Mishra, S., & Hassen, M.H., 2023, Servant leadership and employee's job performance: The role of public service motivation in Ethiopian public sector organizations, International Journal of Public Leadership, 19(1), 64-80, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPL-05-2022-0025.

[10] Ke, J., Zhang, J., & Zheng, L., 2022, Inclusive leadership, workplace spirituality, and job performance in the public sector, Public Performance & Management Review, 45(3), 672-705, https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2022.2069138.

[11] Khassawneh, O., & Elrehail, H., 2022, The effect of participative leadership style on employees' performance: The contingent role of institutional theory, Administrative Sciences, 12(4), 195, https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12040195.

[12] Ludwikowska, K., 2023, Employee-oriented human resource policy as a factor shaping the influence of servant leadership on job performance, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 72(8), 2335-2348, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-09-2021-0525.

[13] Surucu, L., Maslakci, A., & Sesen, H., 2022, Transformational leadership, job performance, self-efficacy, and leader support: Testing a moderated mediation model, Baltic Journal of Management, 17(4), 467-483, https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-08-2021-0306.

[14] Schwepker, C.H., & Dimitriou, C.K., 2021, Using ethical leadership to reduce job stress and improve performance quality in the hospitality industry, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 94, 102860, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.102860.

[15] Aftab, J., Sarwar, H., Amin, A., & Kiran, A., 2022, Does CSR mediate the nexus of ethical leadership and employee's job performance?, Social Responsibility Journal, 18(1), 154-177, https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-09-2020-0393.

[16] Sutanto, E.M., & Hendarto, K., 2020, Leader-member exchange, job involvement, and performance, International Journal of Business and Society, 21(2), 693-702, https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.3283.2020.

[17] Xie, Z., Wu, N., Yue, T., Jie, J., Hou, G., & Fu, A., 2020, How leader-member exchange affects creative performance: An examination from the perspective of self-determination theory, Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 573793, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.573793.

[18] Srimulyani, V.A., Rustiyaningsih, S., Hermanto, Y.B., & Farida, F.A., 2023, Mediation of AKHLAK corporate culture and affective commitment on the effect of inclusive leadership on employee performance, Sustainable Futures, 6, 100138, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2023.100138.

[19] Gabel-Shemueli, R., & Riva, F., 2021, Toward an understanding of the relationship between LMX and performance over time: The role of trust in leader and appraisal satisfaction, Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administracion, 34(4), 578-593, https://doi.org/10.1108/ARLA-12-2020-0255.

[20] Bao, Y., Zhang, Z., & Yang, C., 2025, A meta-analytic review of transformational leadership research in public administration, The American Review of Public Administration, advance online publication, https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740241290810.

[21] Park, J., 2022, What makes performance-related pay effective in the public sector? Target, pay design, and context, Review of Public Personnel Administration, 42(3), 416-443, https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X21990722.

[22] Aoki, N., & Rawat, S., 2020, Performance-based pay: Investigating its international prevalence in light of national contexts, The American Review of Public Administration, 50(8), 865-879, https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074020919995.

[23] Bae, K.B., 2023, The differing effects of individual- and group-based pay for performance on employee satisfaction, Public Management Review, 25(3), 601-619, https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1988270.

[24] Khalid, K., 2020, The impact of managerial support on the association between pay satisfaction, continuance and affective commitment, and employee task performance, SAGE Open, 10(1), 1-13, https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020914591.

[25] Chen, Y., Zhang, Z., Zhou, J., Liu, C., Zhang, X., & Yu, T., 2022, A cognitive evaluation and equity-based perspective of pay for performance on job performance: A meta-analysis and path model, Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1039375, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1039375.

[26] Tarigan, J., Cahya, J., Valentine, A., Hatane, S., & Jie, F., 2022, Total reward system, job satisfaction and employee productivity on company financial performance: Evidence from Indonesian generation Z workers, Journal of Asia Business Studies, 16(6), 1041-1065, https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-04-2021-0154.

[27] Stofberg, R., Bussin, M., & Mabaso, C.M., 2022, Pay transparency, job turnover intentions and the mediating role of perceived organizational support and organizational justice, Employee Relations, 44(7), 162-182, https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-02-2022-0077.

[28] Sudha, A., Azam, S.M.F., & Tham, J., 2025, The effectiveness of financial reward on improving the job performance of public sector employees: The role of organizational commitment, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 74(4), 1180-1200, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-09-2023-0507.

[29] Roos, M., Reale, J., & Banning, F., 2022, A value-based model of job performance, PLOS ONE, 17(1), e0262430, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262430.

[30] Hair, J.F., Howard, M.C., & Nitzl, C., 2020, Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis, Journal of Business Research, 109, 101-110, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069.

[31] Sarstedt, M., Hair, J.F., Pick, M., Liengaard, B.D., Radomir, L., & Ringle, C.M., 2022, Progress in partial least squares structural equation modeling use in marketing research in the last decade, Psychology & Marketing, 39(5), 1035-1064, https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21640.

[32] Hair, J.F., & Alamer, A., 2022, Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example, Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 100027, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027.

[33] House, R.J., & Mitchell, T.R., 1974, Path-goal theory of leadership, Journal of Contemporary Business, 3, 81-97.

2026-09-14