KAJIAN LITERATUR FAKTOR YANG BANYAK MEMPENGARUHI OPINI AUDIT GOING CONCERN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53625/juremi.v2i1.2419Keywords:
Going Concern Audit Opinion; Systematic Literature Review.Abstract
This study aims to summarize the results of previous studies and provide suggestions for further researchers to expand the variables by adding relevant moderating variables to be used in assessing their effect on Going Concern Audit Opinion (GCO). Audit opinion is an important and useful thing for companies that can be used as one of the considerations for creditors or investors to lend some money or to invest. The researcher uses a systematic literature review methodology approach (SLR) with a selected sample of 34 journals published for the period 2006 to 2021. The results show that the factors that have a significant influence on going concern audit opinions are the previous year's audit opinion, debt default, liquidity, auditor reputation and audit lag. Meanwhile, financial distress is a moderating factor for the influence of auditor reputation, auditor switching, and leverage on the acceptance of going concern audit opinions.
References
Alfaizatul Ulya. (2012). Opini Audit Going Concern: Analisis Berdasarkan Faktor Keuangan Dan Non Keuangan. Accounting Analysis Journal, 1(1).
Arens, A, A., Elder, R. J., & Beasley, M. S. (2014). Auditing and Assurance Services; Jilid 1.
Chandra, I., Cianata, S., Rahmi, N. U., Zai, F. S., Alvina, A., & Batubara, M. (2019). Pengaruh Kualitas Audit, Debt Default (Kegagalan Hutang) dan Ukuran Perusahaan terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern pada Subsektor Perusahaan Tekstil & Garment Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia pada Periode 2014-2017. In Owner (Vol. 3, Issue 2, p. 289). https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v3i2.124
DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit fees. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199.
Dewayanto, T. (2011). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern terhadap di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Fokus Ekonomi, 6(1), 81–104.
Dumay, J., Bernardi, C., Guthrie, J., & Demartini, P. (2016). Integrated reporting: A structured literature review. Accounting Forum, 40(3), 166–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2016.06.001
Endiana, I. D. M., & Suryandari, N. N. A. (2021). Opini Going Concern: Ditinjau Dari Agensi Teori Dan Pemicunya. EKUITAS (Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan), 5(2), 224–242. https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2021.v5.i2.4490
Hahn, R., & Kühnen, M. (2013). Determinants of sustainability reporting: A review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.005
HARDI, H., WIGUNA, M., HARIYANI, E., & PUTRA, A. A. (2020). Opinion Shopping, Prior Opinion, Audit Quality, Financial Condition, and Going Concern Opinion. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(11), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no11.169
Januarti, I., & Fitrianasari, E. (2008). Analisis Rasio Keuangan dan Rasio Non Keuangan yang Mempengaruhi Auditor dalam Memberikan Opini Audit Going Concern pada Auditee. In Jurnal Maksi (Vol. 8, Issue 1, pp. 43–58).
Jensen, M. dan W. Meckling (1976), “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency, and Ownership Structure”. Journal of Financial Economics. Vol. 3. (October): pp. 305-360.
Kartika, A., Studi, P., Universitas, A., Kendeng, S. J., Bendan, V., & Semarang, N. (2012). PENGARUH KONDISI KEUANGAN DAN NON KEUANGAN TERHADAP PENERIMAAN OPINI GOING CONCERN PADA PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR DI BEI The Effect of Financial Condition and Non Financial of Going Concern in the Manufacturing Companies Listed at Indonesia Stock Exchange (Vol. 1, Issue 1, pp. 25–40).
Kitchenham, B., Pretorius, R., Budgen, D., Brereton, O. P., Turner, M., Niazi, M., & Linkman, S. (2010). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – A tertiary study. Information and Software Technology, 52(8), 792–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2010.03.006
Kusumayanti, N. P. E., & Widhiyani, N. L. S. (2017). Pengaruh Opinion Shopping, Disclosure Dan Reputasi Kap Pada Opini Audit Going Concern. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 18(3), 2290–2317.
Laksmita, B., & Sukirman, S. (2020). Financial Distress Moderates the Effect of KAP Reputation, Auditor Switching, and Leverage on the Acceptance of Going Concern Opinions. In Accounting Analysis Journal (Vol. 9, Issue 3, pp. 200–207). https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/aaj/article/view/39563
Lee, C., & Park, M. S. (2013). Subjectivity in fair-value estimates, audit quality, and informativeness of other comprehensive income. Advances in Accounting, 29(2), 218–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2013.05.003
Radi, D. O., Wijaya, S. Y., & Julianto, W. (2020). Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan, Masa Audit, dan Gagal Bayar Terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern. Jurnal Syntax Admiration, 1(7), 1–14. https://jurnalsyntaxadmiration.com/index.php/jurnal/article/view/136
Retno Astuti, I. (2012). Pengaruh Faktor Keuangan Dan Non Keuangan Terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 1(2), 1–10. http://ejournal-s1.undip.ac.id/index.php/accounting
Soewiyanto, M. (2012). Aspek-Aspek Dalam Pemberian Opini Audit Going Concern. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Akuntansi, 1(2), 106–110.
Sutedja, C. (2010). Faktor-Faktor Yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Pemberian Opini Audit Going Concern Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur. Jurnal Akuntansi Kontemporer, 2(2), 244083.
