KUALITAS PENGUNGKAPAN PELAPORAN IKLIM DENGAN REKOMENDASI TCFD PERUSAHAAN METAL-MINING DAN BANKS TAHUN 2020-2022

Authors

  • Valentina Nusa Daton Program Studi Akuntansi, Institut Bisnis dan Informatika Kwik Kian Gie, Indonesia
  • Carmel Meiden Program Studi Akuntansi, Institut Bisnis dan Informatika Kwik Kian Gie, Indonesia

Keywords:

Climate Change, Quality, Climate Reporting Disclosures

Abstract

Climate change has become a concern for every sector, including finance. This is the basis for the creation of the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) recommendations. This research aims to determine the quality of climate reporting disclosure following TCFD recommendations. The theories employed in this study are stakeholder theory and legitimacy theory. The content analysis method is utilized to understand and assess the quality of climate reporting disclosure from 18 companies during the period 2020-2022. The results indicate that the majority of companies achieve a moderate quality, suggesting that the implementation of TCFD recommendations is still considered sufficient. The main category of governance and the sub-category of target usage receive the highest rankings, indicating that the disclosure in these categories and sub-categories aligns with TCFD recommendations. The banking sector attains high quality, even though its impact on climate change is not direct. South Africa obtains a high percentage, while the United Kingdom consistently experiences improvement each year.

References

Freeman, R. E., & McVea, J. (2005). A Stakeholder Approach to Strategic Management. SSRN Electronic Journal, January. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.263511

Freeman, R. E., & Reed, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and Stakeholders : A New Perspective on Corporate Governance. California Management Review, XXV(3), 88–106.

Gunawan, J., & Abadi, K. (2017). Content Analysis Method: A Proposed Scoring for Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure (Issue November). Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.

Hurd, I. (1999). Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics. International Organization, 53(2), 379–408. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081899550913

Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (Fourth Ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=en&lr=&id=nE1aDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=krippendorff&ots=yZgk0wjN9v&sig=8bz53PUC8jJSFiVIW9_5-pqHdtk&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=krippendorff&f=false

Martens, W., & Bui, C. N. M. (2023). An Exploration of Legitimacy Theory in Accounting Literature. Open Access Library Journal, 10(01), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1109713

Moloi, T., & Marwala, T. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Economics and Finance Theories. In Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42962-1_13

Mousa, G. A., & Hassan, N. T. (2015). Legitimacy Theory and Environmental Practices: Short Notes. International Journal of Business and Statistical Analysis, 2(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.12785/ijbsa/020104

Raar, J. (2002). Environmental Initiatives: Towards Triple-Bottom Line Reporting. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 7(3), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280210436781

Shocker, A. D., & Sethi, S. P. (1973). An Approach to Incorporating Societal Preferences in Developing Corporate Action Strategies. California Management Review, 15(4), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/41164466

Sugiyono, S. (2023). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif (S. Y. Suryandari (ed.); Edisi Ke-3). CV Alfabeta.

TCFD. (2021). Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures Implementing Implementing the Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. In Task Force on Climate-related Fiancial Disclosures (Issue October). https://assets.bbhub.io/company/sites/60/2020/10/FINAL-TCFD-Annex-Amended-121517.pdf

Downloads

Published

2024-01-31

How to Cite

Valentina Nusa Daton, & Carmel Meiden. (2024). KUALITAS PENGUNGKAPAN PELAPORAN IKLIM DENGAN REKOMENDASI TCFD PERUSAHAAN METAL-MINING DAN BANKS TAHUN 2020-2022. Juremi: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, 3(4), 493–496. Retrieved from https://bajangjournal.com/index.php/Juremi/article/view/7405

Issue

Section

Articles